|
As ESPN
breathlessly reported over and over again, Los Angeles Lakers
owner Jerry Buss publicly stated that he would listen to trade
offers involving petulant star, franchise player, outrageously
overpriced ticket seller, and alleged rapist extraordinaire Kobe
Bryant. Apparently Buss’ prior reaction to Bryant trade offers
was to plug his ears with his index fingers and sing out, “la la
la la I CANT HEAR YOU la la la la.”
Buss’
announcement should have been non-news. There is no such thing
as an untouchable player, and any team that treats a player as
such is stupid. Certainly there are players who a team would not
shop and wouldn’t trade unless they were getting 4 All Stars in
return, but they should still listen to trade offers just in
case. Prior to his announcement, if the Phoenix Suns called Buss
and offered to trade rosters, would he have really rejected them
immediately because he’d refuse to trade Bryant? An LA fan would
need to get video of Suns General Manager Steve Kerr, owner
Robert Sarver, and NBA Commissioner David Stern engaging in a
gangbang while selling drugs to starving infants at a dog fight
over which they preside in order to get such a trade offer, but
Buss wouldn’t turn the offer down if it came. Buss’ statement
wasn’t a signal that they were now willing to move Bryant where
they weren’t before, but rather that they were now interested in
finding out what the market for Bryant is but still didn’t want
to actively shop him. The chances of a Bryant trade are still
about as low as ever.
Normally,
an NBA trade requires an agreement by two parties (the two
teams) which does not violate the rules of the collective
bargaining agreement (CBA). Occasionally there are trades which
involve more than two teams. Bryant has the only no trade clause
in the NBA which makes him uniquely difficult to trade (note:
there are sign and trade deals which require a player to sign
off on the move, but in those situations the player has leverage
against his old team by threatening to sign with another team
and leave his old one with nothing and the player’s old team can
choose to just rid itself of salary by not agreeing to a sign
and trade). Bryant is unlikely to agree to a trade unless it
leaves him on a big market team that is a championship
contender. In the right situation he might eschew the big market
but it would make no sense for him to allow a trade to a
non-contending team as he would be leaving the #2 market in the
country while not improving his chances at a championship. But
Bryant will ensure that any team he is traded to has enough left
around him to compete for a championship. This shrinks the
market for Bryant significantly. Current contenders are the
Spurs, Suns, Mavs, Jazz, Rockets, Heat, Pistons, Cavs, and
Bulls. Longshot fringe contenders include the Raptors, Nuggets,
Warriors, Nets, and Hornets.
The
Lakers do not want to trade Bryant. He is their meal ticket and
may be the best individual player in the NBA. Owner Jerry Buss
derives much of his income from the team and can’t continue to
charge exorbitant prices without either a championship contender
or star power. He’d strongly prefer having both, and perhaps
having a marketable star over a contender. This makes it very
difficult for LA to go the standard rebuilding route of selling
off veterans at 60 cents on the dollar in exchange for prospects
and expiring contracts and being a bad team for a couple years
while the prospects develop and the salary cap room is used to
sign an impact veteran or two. Southern California sports fans
are notoriously fickle and their virtually non-existent
attention span may not be able to handle a 3 to 4 year Laker
rebuild. Buss would need the team to remain a playoff caliber
club and land a marketable star in addition to prospects and cap
space, and then hope that Andruw Bynum develops into an All Star
center. There is a reason that Buss stood by Bryant as Bryant
feuded with Shaq, as Bryant randomly told police about Shaq’s
alleged marital indiscretions, as Bryant’s ego broke up a
potential dynasty, as Bryant publicly and privately cursed out
coach Phil Jackson, as Bryant had a dalliance with the Clippers,
as Bryant publicly demanded and undemanded a trade, and as
Bryant allegedly raped a girl. Buss cannot afford to sell Bryant
for lesser value.
The CBA
must not be violated in order to complete a trade. The first
hurdle that the CBA places in front of any trade is that if the
two teams are over the salary cap (and virtually any team Bryant
would consider is over the cap) then the total salaries each
team is sending to the other must be within 25% of each other.
Bryant is the 8th highest paid player in the NBA this year, due
to make about $19.5 million for the season. This means if LA
sends only Bryant, the package they receive in return must have
salaries totaling between $14.6 million and $24.4 million.
Rookie contracts tend to be relatively small so LA would have to
take back at least one veteran with a significant contract in
addition to any prospects and future draft picks (future picks
don’t count for any salary for purposes of satisfying the CBA in
a trade). Also, Bryant has a trade kicker, meaning his salary
increases if he gets traded (this doesn’t affect legality of
trades, but does make the financial hit on his new team bigger).
Many of
the 14 contenders and fringe contenders can be easily eliminated
from the pool of potential Bryant destinations.
-
The Spurs
are not likely to break up their championship core, especially
to add a selfish player who would not fit their system.
-
Bryant is
unlikely to want to live in Utah and wouldn’t be embraced by
their fan base. Utah wouldn’t want to move Deron Williams (who
LA would probably demand) and LA wouldn’t want to take on the
contract of Andrei Kirilenko (whom Utah would try to force on
LA as Williams is on a rookie contract making $4 million this
year).
-
The Heat
wouldn’t give up Dwyane Wade, not to mention how awkward a
Shaq – Bryant reunion would be.
-
The
Hornets are unlikely to part with Chris Paul and would still
probably not crack the top 4 in the Western Conference after a
Bryant deal. LA would also need to take on the huge contract
of either David West, Peja Stojakovic, or Tyson Chandler. New
Orleans is a small market as well.
-
The Cavs
made the NBA Finals riding Lebron James through a weak Eastern
Conference. Trading James for Bryant doesn’t get them any
closer to a championship and James is younger, cheaper, and
much more marketable as a local product. LA is unlikely to
take a Larry Hughes and Drew Gooden package for Bryant.
-
Getting
Chris Bosh to put alongside Bynum might be enough for LA to
pull the trigger, but Toronto should be loathe to trade young
for old and big for small. The Raptors with Bryant might be
good enough to make a run in the Eastern Conference, but still
aren’t title contenders which makes the deal very unlikely
from both the Toronto and Bryant sides. Bryant is also
unlikely to want to leave the US (if nothing else, he’d lose
money on taxes).
-
The
Pistons do not have a marketable star to send to LA. The
package heading to LA would be centered around shooting guard
Rip Hamilton and the masked man won’t be selling nearly enough
tickets or winning enough games for Buss to pull the trigger.
Detroit lacks young prospects (Buss can’t sell “we traded
Kobe, but we got Jason Maxiell!” to his fan base) to send to
LA and Detroit’s draft picks, especially after a Hamilton for
Bryant trade, will be very late in the first round.
-
Baron
Davis grew up in LA, went to college in LA, and has (along
with Paul Pierce) taken over Magic Johnson’s charity event in
the LA area. He is a marketable star who would probably love
to be a Laker. However, the point of a Warriors deal for the
Warriors and Bryant would be to pair Davis and Bryant.
Swapping the two doesn’t make the Warriors any more likely to
win in the playoffs (assuming Davis is healthy). The Warriors’
best prospect, Andris Biedrins, plays the same position as
Bynum and trading Biedrins leaves the rebounding poor Warriors
with nothing inside. LA would need to agree to a deal centered
around prospects Monta Ellis and Brandan Wright along with
another $13 million in salary (Al Harrington and other
filler?). This is too much of a starless rebuild for LA and it
would be difficult for the Warriors to make the money work and
still have enough left around Davis, Bryant, and Biedrins to
make a run at a title.
-
New Jersey
could try to build a deal around either of its swingmen, Vince
Carter or Richard Jefferson. Carter was recently resigned and
thus cannot be traded for a little while. Even after that
restriction wears off, Carter is still old and has a huge new
contract. He is marketable, but a significant downgrade from
Bryant as a player (and probably in the marketability
department as well) and is injury prone. Jefferson is younger
than Bryant but not nearly as marketable and cannot carry a
team. Even as the third option in a weak conference, Jefferson
was unable to help New Jersey win more than it lost.
Additionally, New Jersey has no high level young prospects to
send to LA.
A look at
the remaining 5 teams:
-
Phoenix
might be Bryant’s preferred destination. They play a fun
style, have an unselfish 2 time MVP point guard, have a
franchise big man who doesn’t dominate the ball, and are
coached by Bryant’s childhood hero, Mike D’Antoni. LA would
ask for Amare Stoudemire and Phoenix would reject it. Shawn
Marion, who can opt out of his contract after this season and
has expressed a desire to leave, would be the centerpiece of
the deal. The problems are money, Marion, and Phoenix’s lack
of depth. Phoenix has been selling off players and first round
draft picks in order to stay under the luxury tax line. Taking
on Bryant would be a costly move for the Suns. Their reticence
to pay the tax has also left them with a lack of depth and
young prospects. A Marion and Barbosa package might be enough
for LA, but would leave Phoenix with no backup to Nash (who is
aging and has chronic back problems) and no bench to speak of
behind old, brittle Grant Hill. The other problem issue is
that Buss may not want to risk Marion walking away after this
season and being left with little or nothing in exchange for
Bryant.
-
The Mavs
are said to be the current leaders in the Bryant sweepstakes,
if there indeed is such a sweepstakes. Dallas has reigning MVP
and David Hasselhoff fanatic Dirk Nowitski, but Bryant is
likely to veto any trade to Dallas which leaves the Mavs
without Dirk. The point for Bryant would be to pair with Dirk
and make a run at a title. Josh Howard is a very good player,
but lack star value and is a Base Year Contract guy. Buss
wouldn’t move Bryant for Jason Terry and change.
-
The Bulls
have been judicious with their money, with only Ben Wallace,
Andres Nocioni, and Kirk Hinrich signed long term. This also
presents a problem as Hinrich and Nocioni are Base Year
Contract players leaving only Wallace as a big money guy to
offset Bryant’s salary in a trade. LA would need to take on
the 3 years $44 million remaining on Wallace’s deal despite
Wallace playing the same position as Bynum. The Bulls would
need to overwhelm LA with talented 20somethings on their
rookie contracts to get Buss to agree to the deal. The word is
that Chicago is unlikely to move Luol Deng, meaning LA would
be looking at receiving some combination of Tyrus Thomas,
Chris Duhon, Joakim Noah, Thabo Sefalosha, and Ben Gordon.
Buss won’t sell a lot of tickets with, “we may have traded
Kobe, but we got Thabo!” Bryant would likely accept a trade to
Chicago, which is the nation’s 3rd biggest media market and
former home of Michael Jordan.
-
The
Rockets are built around two players: Tracy McGrady and Yao
Ming. The logical swap would be McGrady for Bryant. McGrady,
despite his chronic back issues, is probably the best case
scenario for Buss. McGrady is a star in the NBA and some would
argue is about as good of a player as Bryant. Bryant’s ego is
big enough to convince himself that he’d take the Rockets from
the second tier of Western Conference teams into the first
tier occupied by Dallas, San Antonio, and Phoenix. Houston
would need to be convinced to take on extra salary and that
Bryant, who feuded with Shaq and has publicly trashed Bynum,
would not inhibit the growth of Yao Ming and that Bryant is
enough of an upgrade over McGrady to be worth the headaches
he’d cause.
-
The
Nuggets might be a good trade partner if not for Carmelo
Anthony being a Base Year Contract player, making him very
hard to trade without adding several players to the deal on
both sides. Anthony, while not as good as Bryant, is a young
star in the NBA and would sell tickets for Buss. Denver could
paid Iverson and Bryant with Defensive Player of the Year
Marcus Camby and make a run at a ring. Alas, Anthony’s
contract prevents such a move. Moving Iverson for Bryant does
work under the CBA and the Nuggets would likely accept, but
Iverson is an aging star and Denver has no prospects to send
along with him. In the short run, Iverson would serve Buss’
needs but this trade would hurt LA in the long run. Iverson
was traded last season for Andre Miller and a couple draft
picks so his trade value doesn’t command a player of Bryant’s
stature. Plus Denver no longer has those aforementioned draft
picks so they cannot send LA any prospects or draft picks.
Additionally, Colorado was the scene of the alleged crime in
the Bryant rape case which may mean that Bryant would veto any
trade to Denver.
In short,
a Bryant trade likely isn’t coming for at least one more season
and probably not anytime in the foreseeable future. The Lakers,
one of ESPN’s core franchises (along with the Red Sox, Notre
Dame, and every New York team) just needed to fill some
Sportcenter airtime until this week’s Joe Torre marathon.
comments? email us at
comments@osfan.com |